Value
Management (VM) Workshop Process
VM studies are performed into three distinct
parts: 1)
pre-workshop preparation; 2) workshop study; and 3) post-workshop
implementation. Task
flow activities are as follows:
Pre-Workshop
Project
Coordination: Team members, schedule, agenda
Data
Preparation: Facility criteria, drawings, budget
Modeling: Quality, Program (Space), Cost, Energy, LCC, Risk
Workshop
(as per SAVE International Standard)
Information
Phase:
Secure facts, determine cost, fix costs on specific
criteria and requirements.
Function Phase: Verb/noun definitions of function, evaluate relationships
(FAST diagramming) and cost
these functions.
Creativity
Phase: Establish positive thinking, develop creative ideas in a
team setting.
Evaluation
Phase:
Evaluate ideas by advantages and disadvantages, Refine and
combine ideas
Development
Phase: Develop best ideas into alternatives, identify performance
improvements, estimate costs, life cycle costs, sketches
Recommendation
Phase:
Present proposals that resolve the study issues and
motivate to action.
Post-Workshop
Study
Report
VM
Proposal Acceptance Meeting
Implementation
of Proposals
Project
Follow-up
Pre-Workshop
The
success of the VM study is largely dependent on proper preparation
and coordination. Information
and documents are furnished by the designer and Owner and are
distributed to the team to prepare them for their area of study.
All participants are briefed on their role and
responsibility during the study.
The pre-study effort, includes the following activities:
-
Identification of constraints to the VM study
-
Review of project documentation and distribution of
information to team members,
finalization of team and team assignments
-
Preparation of quality, program (space), and cost models
-
Preparation of other models, as appropriate (energy, LCC,
time, distance, risk, etc.)
-
Finalization of arrangements for workshop and location
The
VE team relies on the project manager, design team, construction
manager and the Owner for the completeness and organization of the
material to be furnished. The
following data is normally provided for the study:
-
Community Impact Statement
-
Facility Program and Objectives (Basis of Design)
-
Design Standards & Criteria
-
Master Site Plan (Including Site Analysis)
-
Design Calculations (as appropriate)
-
Soil Borings
-
Design Drawings and Specifications
-
Estimate of Construction Cost (including back-up)
-
Architectural and Engineering Concepts Description
Quality
Model
The
quality model is a narrative expression of "owner
expectations" for the project. The model identifies key issues to be addressed by the
project design regarding: operational
effectiveness, engineering performance, site and building
image/aesthetics, schedule, cost, O&M, flexibility, employee
comfort, safety/security, environment, etc.
The VM team uses this model to help identify qualities of
the present design in need of value improvement.
Program
(Space) Model
A
program model is prepared for the project to identify the
functions of major spaces within the building.
The programmed area is compared against the actual space
allocated at this point in the design. The VM team uses this model to focus their attention on
selected spaces which differ (higher or lower) from the program.
Cost
Model
Cost
information used during the study is normally prepared by the
design team estimators or construction manager prior to the study.
A cost model is then prepared from this information.
The cost model distributes costs by function and is used by
the VE team to help identify areas of potential savings, when
compared to similar facility value standards.
Risk
Model
A
risk model is prepared from discussions with the project
stakeholders and review of the design documents.
The risk model identifies low, medium and high risk project
issues for later discussion by the VE team. The VE team during the
creativity phase tries to identify ways to mitigate the high
risks.
Economic
Factors
During
the value study, construction cost and life cycle cost summaries
are prepared for each element of the project.
Economic data and assumptions, used for the life cycle cost
comparisons, are provided by the Owner.
Following is an example of this data:
-
Discount
Rate
10% (compounded annually)
-
Analysis
Period
20 years
-
Present
Time
Midpoint of construction
-
Equivalent
Approach
Present worth method
-
Inflation
Approach
Constant dollars
Workshop
During
the actual workshop portion of the project study, a five step
approach is followed. This
methodology is an organized approach for searching out high cost
areas in the design and developing alternate solutions for
consideration. The
workshop session uses a multi-disciplined team following an agenda
which details the five step methodology to arrive ultimately at
recommendations for implementation.
The
Workshop follows six key steps, as per SAVE International
Standard:
-
Information Phase
-
Function Phase
-
Creativity Phase
-
Evaluation Phase
-
Development Phase
-
Recommendation Phase
Information
Phase
At
the beginning of the workshop, it is important to understand the
background and decisions that have influenced the development of
the design. For this
reason, the designer normally presents orally the design to the VM
team. The site,
building layout, and architectural, structural, mechanical and
electrical systems are discussed.
The
information phase also includes further refinement of the quality,
program, and cost models that are prepared before the workshop
session. These models
are updated based on information received during the designer's
initial presentation. These
models also form the basis of the VM team function analysis, which
follows.
Function
Phase
The
required functions of the project are the controlling elements in
the overall value approach. This procedure is beneficial to the VM team because it forces
the participants to think in terms of function, and the cost
associated with that function.
In
order that the team might better understand the overall functions
of the project, a "Function Analysis Systems Technique"
(FAST) diagram is prepared. Reading
from left to right, it is used to help explain how the
designer chose to solve the functions.
The FAST diagram, when read from right to left, also helps
answer why these functions are important to the Owner.
Preparing
the function analysis of high cost systems also helps to generate
many of the ideas that eventually result in recommendations.
This forces the team to speculate on alternative solutions
to the proposed design.
Creativity
Phase
This
step in the workshop involves the listing of creative ideas.
During this time, the team thinks of as many ways as
possible to provide the necessary functions within the project at
a lesser cost to the owner. During this creative session, judgement of the ideas is not
permitted. The VM
team is looking for quantity and association of ideas which will
be screened in the next phase of the study.
Many of the ideas brought forth in the creative phase are a
result of work done in the function analysis.
This list may include ideas that can be further evaluated
and used in the design.
Evaluation
Phase
In
this phase of the project, the VM team judges the ideas resulting
form the creative session. The
advantages and disadvantages of each idea are discussed.
Ideas are ranked based on savings potential, redesign time
and client acceptability. Ideas
found to be not worthy of additional study are ranked low and
those ideas that represent the greatest potential are ranked high,
then developed further. A
weighted evaluation is applied in some cases to account for
impacts other than costs. Ideally,
the team would like to develop all ideas, but time constraints
usually limit the number that can be prepared.
The ideas ranked highest by the team are selected for
further review with members of the design team for their input.
Development
Phase
During
the development phase many of the ideas are expanded into workable
solutions. This
development consists of the recommended design, estimated initial
and life cycle cost comparisons, and a descriptive evaluation of
the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed recommendations.
It is important that the VM team convey the concept of
their recommendation to the original design team.
Therefore, each recommendation is prepared with a brief
narrative to compare the original design method to the proposed
changes. Sketches and
design calculations, where appropriate, are also prepared in this
part of the study.
Recommendation
Phase
The
last phase of the workshop is the presentation of recommendations.
The recommendations are further screened by the VM team
before final presentation. An
oral presentation of results is made on the last day of the workshop
to the owner and original design team.
A draft report of recommendations is also submitted at this
time. The
recommendations, the rationale that went into the development of
each proposal, and a summary of the cost savings are presented so
that the design team and owner can initiate an evaluation of the VM
recommendations prior to the receipt of the formal VM report.
Post-Workshop
The
post-workshop portion of the VM study includes preparation and
submittal to the owner and the design team, the VM report
incorporating the recommendations developed in the workshop.
The design team responds by either incorporating the
recommendations into the design or presenting reasons for rejecting
them. A summary of the
cost savings resulting from the study and any requested re-design
cost, is normally also included in the designer's response report,
which, together with the VM report, are submitted to the owner for
review. These two
combined reports form the final VM report.
This post-workshop effort also requires continued project follow-up to resolve any questions remaining with the VM proposals. Either the VM team or the appropriate VM team member responsible for the proposal in question works directly with the design team to finalize implementation.
|